引用 101 里面的描述，他的描述其实也只是一个参考（我觉得他说的挺废话的），我们并不需要非得严谨的去定义什么东西，或者去形成一门学说，因为这归根到底是游戏参与者自己的事情。永远取决于 参与的个体们。它的评价标准就是自己的感觉，并不需要去统计或者描述别人的事情。
From time to time, people decide that they want to enter an ongoing 森弭 relationship in which they will spend most or all of their time in role. These are sometimes described as “24/7” relationships, meaning the people are in role 24 hours a day, seven days a week. I want to take a moment to discuss the broader aspects of such a relationship and its similarities to, and differences from, a more conventional relationship. There are a few characteristics found in almost all these relationships.
1. Both parties recognize that such a relationship exists.
2. Both parties agree to put time and effort into maintaining that relationship.
3. The 森弭 energy always goes in only one direction. That is, one person is always
Ḋṏṁinant and the other is always ṡṻḃmissive. (That means that only one person controls what is going on. It is entirely valid, for example, for the Ḋṏṁinant to order their ṡṻḃmissive to tie them up and torture them. The behavior is not the issue. The issue is who is controlling what happens.)
引用这么一大段英文主要是不想让上面这个 编辑区太空了。以及。。。显得比较懂23333 [s-88] 。可以不看的。
隐藏内容需要登录才可以看见
当然啦我不否认有些人对仪式感的喜爱和倾向于把这件事更加“专业化”的“爱好”，但也仅止步于自己的爱好罢了~用自认为“专业”的条条框框评价他人大概就没必要了呢【不是说楼主哦，楼主没要凸显这个意思，只是中文第一段提到了这个事情~】
而后面的三条，前两条一语蔽之就是简单的“双方达成协议和共识”嘛。但第三条的单向性的想法又是什么人给出的呢?首先众所周知switch的存在，再者并不是所有的森弭关系都那么严苛，有的关系就是打打闹闹。但看在全文的风格和前文提出24/7理论的情况下，这样较为打闹轻松的风格怕是会被这文章的作者当做“伪森弭”亦或是“不专业”吧~那这样怕是就在用自己的思想强压他人了。
希望大家都可以在安全的基础上简单地找到属于自己的快乐。
[s-63] 7/24我以为只是一种生活交织的状态
那不是挺常见的吗 [s-63]
又不是无时无刻都在Training [s-63]
精神上的长时间支配/臣服也可以算是7/24吧 [s-63]
不懂不懂，看完文章我更懵逼了 [s-48]